International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL)
Printer Friendly VersionTell a friend about this page

Countdown Nairobi: Ensure strong commitments to clear all antipersonnel mines!

Dear all,

This is our third Action Alert for COUNTDOWN NAIROBI! We've just passed the 50 day mark -- the Nairobi Summit takes place in just over one and a half months time! Here we focus on encouraging States Parties to commit to accelerating mine clearance so 2009 deadlines can be met!

Why Mine Action? As you know, effective mine action is essential in order to help prevent deaths and injuries and to facilitate post-conflict reconstruction and recovery. Because of the looming challenge for State Parties to meet their deadline to clear mined areas (for those countries that joined in 1997 that deadline is 2009), the Mine Action issue is an important part of preparations for the Nairobi Summit.

You may recall that the ICBL Mine Action Working Group raised some important concerns during the last informal preparatory meeting of the Nairobi Summit in Geneva on 24 September. They were critical of the draft Action Plan and pointed to some key gaps: particularly the lack of commitment to accelerate mine clearance, without which States Parties would not be able to meet their deadlines, and the need for a more effective approach by all actors involved.

The President-Designate of the Summit, Ambassador Petritsch, gave October 4 as a new deadline for States Parties to submit their comments on the draft documents. However, these documents are not finalised yet so there is still an opportunity for input.

Talk to your government now, make sure they support stronger language on Mine Action in the Action Plan and the Review. To make it easy, they could just support the language proposed by the Mine action working group! Remind them of their obligation to destroy ALL mines in known or suspected mined areas as soon as possible and no later than ten years after entry into force for their country or to give assistance to mine-affected States Parties for this purpose.

Thanks a lot !

ICBL staff

Contents

  1. Ensure strong commitments to clear all antipersonnel mines!
  2. Previous Action Countdowns: how is your government prepared for Nairobi ?
  3. To-Do List

1. Ensure strong commitments to clear all antipersonnel mines!

A deminer works in suburban Sarajevo while a boy walks by behind him. Photo: John Rodsted

During the last informal preparatory meeting of the Nairobi Summit, on 24 September ,the ICBL Mine Action Working Group raised some important concerns regarding how mine action was addressed in the draft Action Plan and the draft Review. They questioned the willingness of States Parties to really demonstrate that they want to clear ALL mines by the deadlines, and do so by choosing the most effective approaches based on the real needs in the country.

The Mine action working group raised more particularly the following:

The lack of specific commitment to accelerate mine clearance, in the draft Action Plan, without which States Parties would not be able to meet their deadlines. Some mine affected States Parties have already started saying that they will not be able to meet the deadlines, or will have cleared only high impact areas and not destroyed ALL mines in mined areas, as the Convention requires.

A call for a more detailed language on how States Parties will commit themselves to implement mine action, like ensure that coordination is effectively done at the national but also local level, or that the current management tools are simplified to be easier to use for national authorities and help them to meet their Article 5 obligations. A call for relevant actors of cooperations, like donors, or regional organisations, to ensure that their commitment is long term, and that they improve their policies and strategies to enhance effectiveness in mine action, ensure it is based on real needs analysis and cost effective approaches.

The draft Review does not acknowledge the work and sacrifices of thousands of humanitarians deminers. There is an over emphasis on the development of new technologies. Our colleagues also believe there is an over emphasis on the role of the UN system, and that the Review does not address the cost of coordination, both national and global, that may be better achieved with more simpler solutions.

Please, include these questions in your discussions with the government; ask them to take a stronger stance on Mine Action, one of the key obligation of the Convention, and to come to Nairobi prepared to say how they will have CLEARED and DESTROYED ALL their antipersonnel land mines by their 10 years deadline, and/or how they will ASSIST mine affected countries to do so.

More:

2. Previous action countdown! Were you able to take action ?

  1. Delegations: should be high level, well-prepared
    Is your country represented on the list of the VIPs who have announced that they will be present in Nairobi? www.icbl.org/news/leaders encourage them to feature on it !
  2. Draft documents
    Thirty governments made comments on the draft Review Conference documents at the 24 September informal consultations in Geneva. Particularly almost no mine affected countries, nor African countries. But that does not mean, they haven’t sent their views to Ambassador Petritsch before. Were you able to ask your government for his input ? Did they have other comments, after the meeting ?
    If your government contacts would like copies of ICBL's input to the draft documents, please have them contact walker@icbl.org.
  3. Media
    Did you put the Nairobi summit on the news diaries of key media sources in your country, did you download the posters and approach television stations to air the 40 second spot? Are you planning other media activities?

3. TO-DO LIST

  • How many goals have you already achieved?
  • Remember: The first one to achieve all 12 will win a new ICBL hat and T-shirt printed with our new design for Nairobi!

TO-DO LIST

  1. YES I have contacted my government to call for a high level, well-prepared delegation to the Nairobi Summit
  2. YES I have urged them to be prepared to give input into the draft Action Plan and other Summit documents at the Final Informal Consultation in Geneva on 24 September.
  3. YES I have discussed their efforts for media coverage ahead of the Summit including distribution of the posters and TV advertisement.
  4. YES I have developed my/our own plans for media coverage of the Summit and in the preceding period.
  5. YES/NOT RELEVANT AS NON-MINE AFFECTED I have pushed my government to develop a strong mine action plan and urged them to ask for its inclusion in the Summit Action Plan.
  6. YES/ NOT RELEVANT AS NON-MINE AFFECTED I have called on the government to come to Nairobi prepared to report on plans for and implementation of comprehensive victim assistance programmes
  7. YES I have encouraged my government to make a bold and specific commitment of assistance for the eradication of antipersonnel mines in our countries and others e.g. financial, personnel, technical assistance.
  8. YES I have urged support for ICBL’s view on joint operations, mines with sensitive fuzes and mines kept for training.
  9. YES/NOT RELEVANT AS NO STOCKPILES I have urged that stockpile destruction is speeded up and that specific commitments are included in the Action Plan.
  10. YES I have urged the adoption of national legislation by the Summit OR called for speedy adoption by other states where it is in process.
  11. YES I have urged support for the treaty from non-member states and non-state actors
  12. YES I have encouraged young people in my community to pledge their continued support to rid the world of landmines by endorsing the Youth Declaration that will be presented to world leaders at the Nairobi Summit